The Kinks vs The Beatles vs The Rolling Stones

The Kinks, Beatles, and Rolling Stones had interesting dynamics during the British Invasion era, though it wasn't quite a three-way rivalry in the traditional sense.

The Beatles vs Rolling Stones:

This was more of a media-manufactured rivalry than a real feud. The two bands were actually friendly and respectful of each other. The contrast was more about image and style - The Beatles were positioned as the clean-cut, lovable mop-tops while the Stones were marketed as the dangerous, rebellious bad boys of rock.

John Lennon and Paul McCartney actually gave the Stones one of their early hits by offering them a song. The bands would attend each other's recording sessions and socialized together. The "rivalry" was largely a creation of managers and media to generate interest, though there was natural competitive spirit between two massively successful bands.

The Kinks' position:

The Kinks, led by Ray Davies, had a more complicated relationship with both bands. Ray Davies was known for being prickly and outspoken, and he expressed frustration at times about The Kinks being overshadowed by the Beatles and Stones despite their own innovation and success.

The Kinks had significant hits and were incredibly influential, pioneering hard rock and concept albums, but they never achieved quite the same global domination - partly due to being banned from touring in the US from 1965-1969 due to conflicts with American music unions and promoters.
The reality:

Rather than bitter rivalries, this was more about competitive camaraderie among bands who were all part of the same British rock explosion. They respected each other's music while naturally competing for chart positions and cultural dominance. The real story is how these three bands, each with distinct styles, helped define rock music in the 1960s.

19.7bn all-time streams (2 Nov '25)

14.7bn all-time streams (2 Nov '25)

5.2bn all-time streams (1 Nov '25)